Management of lung cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic: A review

Since its inception, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care as a whole. Cancer patients in general and those suffering from lung cancer in particular are a vulnerable group because of their many intrinsic characteristics and care needs. How SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection affects these patients regarding their risk of infection and outcome in this patient cohort is still to be determined. In this review, we tried to summarize our main concerns regarding COVID-19 in the context of cancer patients from a clinical and multidisciplinary approach. Different types of lung cancer treatments (chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy) may also influence the risk of infection and condition the patient's risk of having a worse outcome. Lung cancer patients require frequent radiologic study follow-ups, which may be affected by COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 related incidental radiologic findings can appear in routinely scheduled radiology tests, which may be difficult to interpret. Also cancer treatment induced pneumonitis may have similar radiologic features similar to those in acute SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and lead to a wrong diagnosis. The different health care needs, the requirement for continuous health care access and follow-ups, and the clinical traials in which this patient population might be enrrolled are all being affected by the current COVID-19 health crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has put health care providers and institutions in difficult situations and obliged them to face challenging ethical scenarios. These issues, in turn, have also affected the psychological well-being of health care workers.Copyright © The Author(s) 2021.

Heteronormativity in health settings: Realities of LGBT youth's access to healthcare in South Africa

In South Africa, sexual and gender minorities experience a wide array of health inequities and face many difficulties in accessing health services. This is largely due to the general heteronormative-based health system that is not well equipped to meet the needs of those not conforming to "normal" forms of gender and sexuality. In addition, the heteronormative-based approach to LGBT health has rendered the unique needs and experiences of sexual and gender minorities invisible within mainstream health data, systems and policies. Increasing evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has worsened health disparities and this is likely a consequence of existing challenges related to structural violence that persisted prior to its emergence. Given the current structure of South Africa's health system, this chapter examines structural violence in the context of healthcare and draws on in-depth interviews conducted with 12 LGBT students at a university in South Africa. The findings highlight the importance of raising awareness on the spectrum of sexual orientation and gender identity, applying an intersectional lens to the health system to address health inequities and gearing healthcare programs to provide services for all. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

The COVID-19 pandemic required a rapid expansion of teledermatology services

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic required a rapid expansion of tele dermatology services. Objective(s): Analyse demographic shifts in a pediatric dermatology practice session with children of colour. Method(s): A retrospective chart review of pediatric dermatology patients seen in the four practice weeks preceding the New York COVID-19 lockdown and comparable tele dermatology visits during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Demographic differences (e.g., race, age, gender and household income) were analysed. Result(s): A greater proportion of patients seen were White during lockdown (59.7%), compared to pre-lockdown (43.6%), with a reduction in Asian patients seen in lockdown (6.0%) compared to prelockdown (24.5%). A lower proportion of no-show patients (4.3%, 3/70 scheduled) were noted in lockdown compared to pre-lockdown (16%, 18/112). Preferred provider organizations and higher-income zip codes were more common for children seen during lockdown. Limitation(s): The sample addresses a limited New York pediatric dermatology practice during a short time-period. Conclusion(s): White patients and patients with preferred provider organizations were more likely to access telehealth, supporting disparity in tele dermatology services. These results demonstrate reduced healthcare access for lower-income and Asian children during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

Societal drivers of antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is caused by and exacerbates social and health inequalities. Human and animal antimicrobial use is contributing as much as societal failures to dispose of and manage our waste and respect our environment. A multisector, multidisciplinary approach is required to resolve these issues.Copyright © ERS 2023.

Clinical Uses of Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices Using Photoplethysmography as a Promising Ambulatory Telemonitoring Tool: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: As check-ups in healthcare facilities are much arduous during the pandemic including blood pressure (BP) control, an alternative is urgently needed to replace the use of disturbing cuff-based office and ambulatory BP monitoring (BPM) devices. With the advancement of telemedicine, real-time checking and reporting of blood pressure may be potentially achieved using photoplethysmography (PPG) technology in cuffless devices. Therefore, this study evaluated the accuracy of these devices compared to the cuff-based BPM devices. Method(s): This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the PRISMA 2020 guideline through multiple databases using Rayyan according to the prearranged inclusion and exclusion criteria, yielding six clinical studies to be included in the final review and analysis. Result(s): Overall fixed-effect meta-analysis of all studies (total of 319 subjects) presented small differences between cuffless and cuff-based devices, showing promising accuracy according to the current medical instrumentation guideline both in measuring systolic BP (SMD: 0.23 mmHg [95% CI: 0.07-0.39], p = 0.004;I2= 0%, p = 0.55) and diastolic BP (SMD: 0.27 mmHg [95% CI: 0.11-0.43], p = 0.0007;I2= 39%, p = 0.14). Discussion(s): PPG itself is a noninvasive technology, consisting of an infrared-emitting light source and a photodetector to measure the blood-reflected light intensity. Despite its ease in equipment, it measures BP accurately without being influenced by various positions and activities. Moreover, the data can be accessed real-time by both users and healthcare providers. Conclusion(s): In summary, cuffless PPG BPM devices have the potential in becoming a telemonitoring device for ambulatory patients for its accuracy. Its presence may be the answer to current restriction towards healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, in order to further confirm our findings, more clinical studies with various settings are encouraged to be held.

ECMO-COVID offer and global mortality: Where does Portugal stand?

Objectives: To evaluate the ECMO offer during the COVID pandemic in the different European countries Methods: We colected COVID and demographic data from Worldometer and the national ECMO runs from the EuroELSO platform. Result(s): Europe presented a broad offer of ECMO. If during the first wave the Health System;s resources were not prepared to accommodate the high number of patients, during the following two years ECMO demonstrated to be a useful tool in the treatment of COVID pneumonia. However, across different European countries the use of ECMO was very different. In Portugal ECMO was used in 336 patients, in a universe of 5,557,941 COVID cases within a total population of 10,140,570 individuals. Of these, 336 were placed on extracorporeal circulation, which corresponds to 60.5 cases per million positive cases and 33.1 per 1 million individuals. The average number of patients placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) per million positive cases was 39 amongst the surveyed countries. Portugal was the 4th country with the most patients of ECMO per million cases (1st is Belgium with 106.5;Estonia 106.1;and Austria 68.5) and per million inhabitants (33.1), after Estonia (49.2), Austria (43.2) and Belgium (42.6). The mortality rate of COVID patients in Portugal is 0.46%. It is lower than the average of the countries under analysis (0.56%). When analyzing the frequency of cases concerning the mortality rate, there is seemingly an increase in the mortality rate with a decrease in the number of cases. The significant differences in the mortality rate between different countries can be explained by several other factors: different criteria for the main diagnosis of death;capacity of the different countries regarding the population;s access to vaccination and the different access to health care. Conclusion(s): ECMO-COVID offer was very different across countries. In Portugal, the offer was amongst the greatest in Europe, not compromising the overall response to the global COVID population.

Descriptive Study Investigating Impact of Transition to Universal Health Insurance Coverage on Utilization of Healthcare in Sudan, 2016 - 2021

Objectives: Since 2016, Sudan was transitioning from limited healthcare subsidization to universal health coverage (UHC). Increasing healthcare access was widely considered beneficial, but some worried that UHC would overwhelm clinical services. In 2020 and 2021 UHC faced the challenge of Covid-19. We undertook a review of national healthcare utilization and enrolment data in order to better understand the impact of UHC in Sudan. Method(s): We conducted a descriptive study using National Health Insurance Fund databases. We analyzed annual enrolment, participating facilities, prescription volume and utilization from 2016 to 2021. Enrolment was stratified by employment status (government, informal sector, private sector, pensioner, impoverished). Utilization was assessed by type of care: primary, specialty, chronic disease and other;we calculated the ratio of primary to specialty care visits. We used the Mann-Kendall test for evaluating trends. Result(s): Participating facilities increased from 2,083 in 2016 to 3,549 in 2019, with slight contraction to 3,495 during 2020-21. Annual enrolment increased significantly, from 16.4 million in 2016 to 36.5 million in 2021 (p value < 0.01). The impoverished sector had the largest increase in enrolment (217%);informal sector had the lowest enrolment growth rate (7%). Volume of primary healthcare visits and prescriptions increased every year, except 2020, the first year of Covid-19 in Sudan. Specialty healthcare visits decreased over the same period, from 2,461,424 to 1,249,585 (p < 0.01). The ratio of primary to specialty visits increased from 6.0 in 2016 to 15.7 in 2021 (p < 0.001). Conclusion(s): In Sudan, transition to UHC increased utilization of primary care services, but at a slower rate than enrolment growth. The ratio of primary to specialty visits increased and specialty visits declined, suggesting that more primary care may have prevented specialist-requiring disease states and sequelae. Fears of overwhelming the health system were unfounded indicating that other barriers to healthcare might exist.Copyright © 2023

LGBTQ College student health and wellbeing at the onset of the pandemic: additional evidence and lessons learned from COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has killed more than six million people and disrupted health care systems globally. In the United States alone, more than one million people have died from COVID-19 infections. At the start of the pandemic, nearly all aspects of our lives paused to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus. Many institutions of higher education transitioned to remote learning and enacted social distancing measures. This study examined the health needs and vulnerabilities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) college students at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. METHODS: We fielded a rapid-response online survey between April and June of 2020. We recruited 578 LGBTQ-identifying college students aged 18 years and older by reaching out to LGBTQ-serving organizations on 254 college campuses and via targeted social media advertising. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of LGBTQ college students surveyed were dissatisfied with life at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, and almost all (90%) were concerned that COVID-19 would threaten their mental health. Moreover, about 40% of LGBTQ college students reported unmet mental health needs, and 28% were worried about seeking care during the pandemic because of their LGBTQ identity. One out of four LGBTQ college students had to go back in the closet because of the pandemic, and approximately 40% were concerned about their finances or personal safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some of these adverse outcomes were prominent among younger students, Hispanic/Latinx students, and students with unsupportive families or colleges. CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds novel findings to the large body of research demonstrating that LGBTQ college students experienced distress and elevated mental health needs early in the pandemic. Future research should examine the long-term consequences of the pandemic among LGBTQ and other minoritized college students. Public health policymakers, health care providers, and college and university officials should provide LGBTQ students affirming emotional supports and services to ensure their success as the COVID-19 pandemic transitions to endemic.

Exploring Prenatal Care Quality and Access During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Pregnant Immigrants in Philadelphia Through the Lens of Community-Based Organizations.

Background: The peak of the COVID-19 pandemic led to decreased maternal and child health care engagement, especially among marginalized populations. Existing disparities in prenatal care access and quality faced by pregnant immigrant people are likely to be amplified by the pandemic. Materials and Methods: We conducted a study with direct service providers (DSPs) at community-based organizations (CBOs) serving pregnant immigrant families in the Philadelphia region. Semistructured interviews addressed barriers and facilitators to prenatal health care access and engagement among immigrant families both before and then after the onset of the pandemic in March 2020. Additional questions elicited context about the demographics of service populations, organizational connectedness to health care providers, and pandemic-related operational changes. Results: Between June and November 2021, 10 interviews were conducted in English and Spanish with DSPs at 5 CBOs. Primary themes included diminished access and quality of care received due to decreased language accessibility, increased restrictions around support persons, shifts to telemedicine, and changes to appointment scheduling. Additional themes included heightened hesitancy engaging with services due to documentation status, confusion around legal rights, financial strain, and health insurance status. Interviewees provided suggestions for improving service access during and postpandemic for immigrant pregnant people, including implementation of culturally responsive group prenatal care, institutional policies to improve understanding of legal rights, and increased financial supports. Conclusions: Understanding emergent and exacerbated barriers to prenatal care access and quality during the COVID-19 pandemic provides context for how to improve health equity for immigrant pregnant people through public health and health care policies as the pandemic continues, and once it has subsided.

Telehealth for pediatric well visits: sometimes the best option

During the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic, pediatricians realized that to reach families and continue to provide preventive care, including developmental, mental health, and social determinants of health screenings, they needed to embrace telehealth and meet families where they were: at home. [...]many families expressed that they were more comfortable staying on "their turf" rather than coming to a health care facility, which changes the power paradigm of who drives the visit. During the pandemic, current fee-for-service models have rapidly exposed the problems with our health care system.

Temporal Analysis of Medicare Physician Reimbursement for Common Gastroenterology Procedures From 2007 to 2022

Introduction: As the U.S. population ages, gastroenterologists will provide care for an increasing number of older patients - many of whom use Medicare. In recent years there have been significant policy changes surrounding Medicare reimbursement for physicians. Understanding reimbursement trends can help reveal the financial impact of these policies on gastroenterologists. Our study aims to analyze the trends in Medicare reimbursement of common gastrointestinal (GI) services from 2007 to 2022. Method(s): The top 10 GI procedures and their respective CPT codes were identified through a joint list published by the American College of Gastroenterology, American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and American Gastroenterological Association. The top 5 5 CPT codes relating to office/inpatient visits provided by gastroenterologists to Medicare Part B beneficiaries was identified using data from CMS. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from CMS was queried for the selected CPT codes from 2007 to 2022, to determine the facility reimbursement rate by Medicare for each service. The reimbursement data were adjusted to January 2022 U.S. dollars using the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics' consumer price index inflation calculator. Result(s): The unadjusted physician reimbursement for GI procedures exhibited an average decrease of 7.0% (95% CI, 29.9% to 24.1%) from 2007 to 2022. After adjusting for inflation, the mean decrease in physician reimbursement for procedures was 33.0% (95% CI, 235.1% to 230.9%). The mean annual growth rate in reimbursement was 22.6% (95% CI, 22.8% to 22.4%). The unadjusted physician reimbursement for inpatient and outpatient visits exhibited an average increase of 32.1% (95% CI, 4.8% to 59.3%). After adjusting for inflation, physician reimbursement for patient visits exhibited a mean decrease of 4.92% (Figure 1). Conclusion(s): The analysis revealed a steady decline in adjusted and non-adjusted reimbursement between 2007 and 2022. Decreasing Medicare reimbursement may impact health outcomes, healthcare access, and patient satisfaction. Reimbursement policies must be scrutinized particularly in the light of high inflation and increased costs due to additional costs associated with care during the COVID-19 pandemic, staffing shortages, and increased staffing salaries. (Figure Presented).

Explanation of Factors Affecting Self-care and Diabetes Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

Introduction: Adopting diabetes self-care behaviors to control blood glucose is essential, but adherence to them has been challenged due to restrictions related to Covid-19. These restrictions have negatively impacted the psychosocial condition of individuals with diabetes, which could lead to poor self-care. Accordingly, this study aimed to explore the experiences of individuals with type 2 diabetes regarding self-care behaviors and diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): This qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis, the data of which were collected through interviews with people over 18 years of age with type 2 diabetes who were selected from the Endocrinology Clinic of Erfan Hospital in Tehran. Using telephone and WhatsApp, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants (15 women). Content analysis was done using the constant comparative method, and the open and axial coding method was applied. The data were manually coded, and the main themes and categories emerged from data. Result(s): Two main themes emerged from the data: 1) challenges and limitations toward diabetes self-care and 2) facilitators of efficient self-care. Challenges and limitations included 4 sub-themes: Inevitable lifestyle changes, psychosocial problems, limited/lack of access to health care services and medication, and adverse physical effects. Facilitators had 2 sub-themes: improved individual capability and maintaining social interaction. Conclusion(s): Our findings indicated that inevitable lifestyle changes, limited access to health care, and adverse psychosocial consequences were the most critical challenges for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Improving stress management skills and effective coping strategies can facilitate the adoption of self-care behaviors.Copyright © 2022, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences. All rights reserved.

Trends for Opioid Prescriptions and the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic among Patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases between 2006 and 2021

Background/Aims Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are some of the most common indications for prescribed opioids. It is unclear how opioid prescribing has changed in the UK for RMDs, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited healthcare access and cancelled elective-surgical interventions, which could impact prescribing in either direction. We aimed to investigate trends in opioid prescribing in RMDs and assess the impact of the pandemic in the UK. Methods Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia with opioid prescriptions between 01/Jan/2006-31/Aug/2021 without prior cancer in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) were included. We calculated ageand gender-standardised yearly rates of people with opioid prescriptions between 2006-2021, and identified change points in trends by checking whether the rate of change of standardised rates crossed zero. For people with opioid prescriptions, monthly measures of mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day were calculated between 2006-2021. To assess the impact of the pandemic, we fitted regression models to the monthly number of people with opioid prescriptions between Jan/2015-Aug/2021. The time coefficient reflects the trend pre-pandemic and the interaction term coefficient represents the change in the trend during the pandemic. Results We included 1,313,519 patients: 36,932 with RA, 12,649 with PsA, 6,811 with AxSpA, 6,423 with SLE, 1,255,999 with OA, and 66,944 with fibromyalgia. People with opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2018 for OA, to 2019 for RA, AxSpA and SLE, to 2020 for PsA, and to 2021 for fibromyalgia, and all plateaued/decreased afterwards. OA patients on opioids increased from 466.8/10,000 persons in 2006 to a peak of 703.0 in 2018, followed by a decline to 575.3 in 2021. From 2006 to 2021, there was a 4.5-fold increase in fibromyalgia opioid users (17.7 vs.78.5/10,000 persons). In this period, MME/day increased for all RMDs, with the highest for fibromyalgia (>=35). During COVID-19 lockdowns, RA, PsA and fibromyalgia showed significant changes in the trend of people with opioid prescriptions. With a decreasing trend for RA (-0.001,95%CI=-0.002,-0.001) and a decreasing-to-flat curve for PsA (0.0010,95%CI=0.0006,0.0015) prepandemic until Feb/2020, the trends changed by -0.005 (95%CI=-0.008,-0.002) for RA and -0.003 (95%CI=-0.006,-0.0003) for PsA, leading to steeper decreasing trends during the pandemic (Mar/2020-Aug/2021). Fibromyalgia, conversely, had an increasing trend (0.009,95%CI=0.008,0.009) pre-pandemic, and this trend started decreasing by -0.009 (95%CI=-0.011,-0.006) during the pandemic. Conclusion The plateauing/decreasing trend of people with opioid prescriptions in RMDs after 2018 may reflect the efforts to tackle the rising opioid prescribing in UK primary care. Of all RMDs, fibromyalgia patients had the highest MME/day throughout the study period. COVID-19 lockdowns contribute to fewer people on opioids for most RMDs, reassuring there was no sudden increase in opioid prescribing during the pandemic.

Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms Were More Common for Transgender Individuals Whose Gender-Affirming Surgeries Were Cancelled or Delayed Due to COVID-19: A Global Cross-Sectional Study

Gender-affirming surgeries, which have well-established mental health benefits, were cancelled and delayed for transgender people worldwide during the COVID-19 crisis. Of 253 scheduled gender-affirming surgeries among transgender adults across 35 countries in late 2020, 27% (n=69) reported that the COVID-19 crisis limited their access to gender-affirming surgery (i.e., cancelled, postponed indefinitely, or rescheduled). In adjusted models, respondents with reduced access to surgeries were somewhat more likely to screen positive for depressive or anxiety symptoms, whereas those who maintained access were more likely to report higher levels of happiness. Our findings illustrate the transgender-specific harms of the COVID-19 crisis on gender-affirming surgeries and mental health.

Racism in pediatric health

SPECIAL REPORT Since the inception of the United States, social, economic, political, and scientific institutions have been built on a foundation emphasizing the inferiority of individuals related to phenotypic differences.1 This hierarchy ensconced white individuals as superior to all other groups with Native Americans and Blacks on the bottom. Some fifty years after the discovery of the genetic code, at a White House ceremony in 2000 to announce the discovery, Craig Venter, a pioneer of DNA sequencing, observed, "The concept of race has no genetic or scientific basis. With structural or institutional racism, there is decreased access to health care and resources for education, leading to lower health literacy and fewer health care providers of color.12'13 Over time, this has led to a distrust of the health care system as a whole by POC due to widely publicized historical events such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the Marion tuberculosis outbreak. [...]non-Hispanic Blacks have a higher prevalence of recurrent asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations than Whites after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors.16 One study revealed that with non-Black children, poor children were 45% more likely than children who were not poor to have asthma.

How pediatricians can help mitigate the mental health crisis

Just as traumatic or stressful events and experiences can increase the risk, strong and supportive relationships and institutions can offset or mitigate that risk. [...]if mental health conditions do develop, early and ongoing recognition and treatment can decrease associated morbidity.2 4 The 2019-2020 National Survey of Children's Health showed that 23% of children aged 3 to 17 years have a reported mental, emotional, developmental, or behavioral (MEDB) problem, with prevalence unevenly distributed by geographic area and social determinants of health: Beginning in April 2020, the proportion of mental health-related visits in pediatric emergency departments increased significantly for both children and adolescents.8 A 2021 report from the Child Mind Institute, "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children's Mental Health: What We Know So Far," highlights the disproportionate negative impact on vulnerable children: those with preexisting mental health problems, especially those with limited access to treatment, racial minorities experiencing racism in the health care system and beyond, LGBTQ+ children, and families living with economic uncertainty or food insecurity.4 Skill-building resources To mitigate the level of need that has created the current crisis, it is particularly important that emerging mental health symptoms be recognized and addressed early within the pediatric medical home before they escalate to the level of crisis. [...]the AAP has developed a mental health toolkit for pediatricians that includes materials, real- world cases, tools for screening, video examples of skills, and an algorithm serving as a cognitive map for how to approach mental health concerns in an outpatient office setting.9 Another resource, The REACH Institute, offers live and online evidence-based training courses for pediatricians on identification and treatment of mental health issues, including screening, medication management, cognitive behavioral therapy, and a host of other topics, all patient-centered and designed to be feasible in an outpatient office setting.10 (For more on The REACH Institute and pediatrician training, see "Guiding principles in managing pediatric mental health issues," page 18.) Address the economic and social barriers that contribute to poor mental health foryoung people,families, and caregivers. 6 Increase timely data collection and research to identify and respond to youth mental health needs more rapidly.

Increasing Access to a Diverse Mental Health Workforce through Emergency Reciprocity Licensure

New Jersey's COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Reciprocity Licensure Program provided temporary licenses to more than 31000 out-of-state healthcare practitioners, over a quarter of whom were mental health providers. As the need for mental health care accelerated during the pandemic, especially among health disparity populations, expanding mental health provider pools may be a critical tool to increase access to care. In January 2021, we surveyed New Jersey's temporary licensees. We analyzed over 4500 mental health provider responses to examine the impact of the temporary licensure program on access to mental health care overall and on enhancing a diverse mental health workforce. Over 3700 respondents used their temporary license to provide mental health care to New Jersey patients. About 7% of respondents self-identified as Hispanic, 12% Black, 6% Asian, 1% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 0% (more than 5) Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander. They treated about 30100 New Jersey patients, 40% of whom were new to the provider, and 81% delivered care exclusively using telehealth. Respondents conversed with patients in at least 13 languages. About 53% served at least one patient from an underserved racial/ethnic minority group. Our findings suggest that temporary out-of-state mental health providers helped enhance mental health care continuity and access. Copyright 2023 Federation of State Medical Boards. All Rights Reserved.

The impact of COVID-19 on access to mental health services and the use of teletherapy as an alternative form of treatment

The aim of this research study is to determine the impact of COVID-19 on access related to mental health services and also explain the use of teletherapy as an alternative form of treatment. This research study is based on secondary research data analysis to determine the research study data collected from websites related to the ratios of COVID-19 also that mental health services. Determine the research study used E-views software, and the generated result included descriptive statistics, correlations, the dickey fuller test analysis, the histogram, and state, also that explain the variance and test of equality between them. The overall result shows COVID-19 shows a direct impact on mental health services;teletherapy directly links with mental health services. Benefits make teletherapy the best online therapy session for overcoming various types of depression and mental illness in patients. Also, teletherapy is an alternative form of mental health service that is mostly provided to people affected due to the pandemic conditions of the coronavirus.Copyright © 2022, Universidade de Sao Paulo. Museu de Zoologia. All rights reserved.

Some key aspects of telemedicine development to support human illness: a systematic review

The aim of this research is to describe the use of telemedicine applied to patients characterised by a particular state of illness, which often drives them toward a frail and chronic status, in a systematic manner. This work employed the Tranfield approach to carry out a systematic literature review (SLR), in order to provide an efficient and high-quality method for identifying and evaluating extensive studies. The methodology was pursued step by step, analysing keywords, topics, journal quality to arrive at a set of relevant open access papers that was analysed in detail. The same papers were compared to each other and then, they were categorised according to significant metrics, also evaluating technologies and methods employed. Through our systematic review we found that most of the patients involved in telemedicine programs agreed with this service model and the clinical results appeared encouraging. Findings suggested that telemedicine services were appreciated by patients, they increased the access to care and could be a better way to face emergencies and pandemics, lowering overall costs and promoting social inclusion.Copyright © 2022 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.